Ive been a hardcore fan of the show since season 1 episode 1. Stuck through it good times and bad. Season 3 was great under Erickson. But am i the only one who notices this sub completely glorifies him while forgetting the first two seasons under him were universally hated?
Im in the minority which enjoys season 4. Yes, personally i wish erickson had stayed on to finish his story as he was was really coming into his own...but can you really blame AMC for firing him? The first two season were universally hated and ratings fell from 10 million viewers an episode to around 2 million an episode. Even during the acclaimed season 3 ratings fell dramatically each episode.
AMC doesnt want this show to be a failure. But its hard to justify giving Erickson new seasons if under his guidance the show is constantly losing viewers. Furthermore i would go as far as to say if this season still had Erickson as showrunner and played out the exact same way as it has under new management ya'll would be praising it.
I personally am annoyed and fed up with the major time skip, but for what we've got the new season is still better than season 1 and 2. And also still better than the past few walking dead seasons. And funny enough Season 4 has been better critically acclaimed than season 3. Look at the show to show reviews and most critics tend to like Season 4 better than season 3.
This isnt me hating on Erickson. Personally i like the guy and wish he had stayed on. I just personally am a bit confused on how Season 3 has completely made everyone here forget how bad the first two seasons were....where everyone on this subreddit was calling for Erickson to be removed. Funny how things change i suppose
Submitted May 28, 2018 at 09:27AM by Waffles528 https://ift.tt/2KXshD6
No comments:
Post a Comment